PDA

View Full Version : FCC OKs Wireless Roaming Rules To Improve Voice But Not Data


tmobilefan
08-07-2007, 03:45 PM
August 07, 2007: 05:25 PM EST


WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Larger cellular carriers will be compelled to offer service to smaller wireless companies so their customers can automatically receive a signal when they travel around the U.S., the Federal Communications Commission said Tuesday.

At a public meeting, the commission's five members voted in favor of new rules forcing wireless carriers to offer terms to other cellular companies that are " reasonable and non-discriminatory."

The new rules don't impose a cap on how much cellular companies can charge for the service, saying instead they would leave it up to the marketplace to determine the terms of any agreements.

The obligation will include roaming agreements for voice service as well as text messaging and push-to-talk service, which is similar to a walkie-talkie and is being offered by Nextel Communications, a subsidiary of Sprint Nextel Corp. ( S).

But it won't include data, or broadband, service, which is an increasingly important part of wireless carriers' revenue.

FCC commissioners said they would accept comments from the public on whether these data services should be included in the new rules. Democratic Commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein both said they were in favor of data service being covered by the new rules.

"I believe we should have taken another step forward today," Copps said at the meeting. "Consumers rely upon their mobile handsets these days for a dizzying array of data services, going well beyond those we cover in today's item."

Republican Chairman Kevin Martin said that, although he was sympathetic to some of the points made by smaller wireless carriers, he believed the market should be left to come up with a solution.

Clay Dover, executive director of the San Antonio-based Rural Cellular Association, said the ruling by the FCC was nothing more than an incremental step.

Dover said most smaller wireless carriers have some sort of roaming agreement with large companies for voice services, but many struggle to get a similar deal for data services from the large carriers like AT&T Inc. (T), Verizon Wireless - which is jointly owned by Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Vodafone PLC ( VOD) - and Sprint Nextel.

"We enter into both voice and data roaming agreements at reasonable terms with other carriers, and we certainly are not aware of AT&T being the subject of any complaints on this issue to the FCC," said an AT&T spokesman.

Dover said "consumers of the rural carriers want the same services as folks in cities have. If they travel out of their current service area, they often don't have access to the types of services they would in their local area."

Dover's concern was echoed by a Washington-based telecommunications lawyer who works on behalf of U.S. Cellular Corp. (USM), the country's sixth-largest wireless carrier.

"The development of data services is getting to be a very important part of the service package that companies will be providing," said the lawyer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

In a recent filing at the FCC, cable giant Comcast Corp. (CMCSA) also expressed its desire to see a requirement that large wireless carriers sign roaming agreements for data as well as voice.

Comcast, along with Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC) and privately owned Cox Communications, acquired significant amounts of spectrum in an auction held by the FCC last year, and is currently designing a strategy for an entry into the wireless market.

FCC OKs Wireless Roaming Rules To Improve Voice But Not Data (http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200708071725DOWJONESDJONLINE000625_FORTUNE5.htm)

Railroader
08-07-2007, 09:58 PM
I guess we're lucky here, our three carriers here (US Cellular, Verizon, Edge Wireless (AT&T Affiliate) ) all have agreements that allow data, voice, text and mms across the country on various carriers,ie.AT&T, Verizon, etc

chokaay
08-08-2007, 12:52 AM
Here's another article: YAHOO NEWS: FCC Requires Mobile Carriers To Allow Roaming (http://news.yahoo.com/s/infoworld/20070807/tc_infoworld/90821).

Now wouldn't it be GREAT if T-Mobile actually used this to their advantage and decided to allow roaming on AT&T (or any other available GSM provider) where they DON'T have native coverage??? I mean, now they HAVE TO be charged "reasonable rates" from AT&T and other roaming partners... so maybe they can afford to allow roaming in more markets... :D

Railroader
08-08-2007, 01:34 AM
Well, they do allow roaming onto Edge Wireless (AT&T Affiliate), and other carriers where they don't have service (like up here where I live, Edge Wireless is the GSM provider), and there is one spot in CA where they allow roaming onto AT&T, in the Shingletown, Mineral and Lassen Volcanic National Park areas (though there is no signal from any carrier inside the park itself) east of Redding here in NorCal.

What T-Mobile doesn't seem to want to allow is in-market roaming on AT&T, ie.roaming in markets where they have native signal, but in certain spots is either weak or non-existent. For example, Verizon allows in-market roaming onto US Cellular Extended Network here and across NorCal, due to their network being subpar in several spots, especially here in Mendocino and Lake Counties (RSA 344), my Verizon phone automatically goes over to US Cellular at my house and other areas where Verizon's native signal is poor to non-existent. I am guessing T-Mobile doesn't allow in-market roaming in most places to keep costs down, but if you can't make a call cost doesn't really matter. T-Mobile can take a lesson from Verizon in this respect.

Edit-One spot in the San Gabriel Valley there in SoCal is horrible with T-Mobile, San Dimas, if they would allow in-market roaming onto AT&T (who has awesome service there) it woud help a lot.

Edit2-I should note T-Mobile is licensed to serve my area, and that area east of Redding, but has never built out their own network, the same goes for Sprint/Nextel, AT&T and Metro PCS.

CSI_Nut
08-08-2007, 12:43 PM
I'm a bit confused on this. Exactly whose fault is it that I can see Cingular/AT&T on my network selection list but not access it? I always thought that was Cingular/AT&T's fault? But it sounds like you're saying it's T-Mobile's fault?

tmobilefan
08-08-2007, 12:49 PM
I'm a bit confused on this. Exactly whose fault is it that I can see Cingular/AT&T on my network selection list but not access it? I always thought that was Cingular/AT&T's fault? But it sounds like you're saying it's T-Mobile's fault?

T-Mobile does not have a nationwide roaming agreement with AT&T/Cingular, so it appears on the list, because it is there, but it does not let us connect because there is no agreement. Sometimes it might connect if you are in an area that they have agreements like Railroader said.

CSI_Nut
08-08-2007, 02:36 PM
The FCC ruling itself seems a bit anti-competitive to me. If T-Mobile is considered a "smaller company" compared to AT&T, then AT&T becomes required to provide roaming coverage to its competition by the FCC ruling. Kind of like forcing Wal-Mart to sell part of its infrastructure to Target. On the other hand, T-Mo's customers could surely benefit from the expanded coverage area that a nationwide roaming agreement with AT&T would provide. The FCC seems to be saying that AT&T must do exactly that, provided T-Mo pays a "reasonable" fee. But who defines what is "reasonable?" I would call "reasonable" no more than 5 cents per minute. AT&T might call it 40 cents per minute. T-Mo would probably call it whatever the market (its customers) would pay. It seems to me that you're taking market forces out of play by the FCC ruling then leaving a deliberately vague hole with the term "reasonable." I sense trouble brewing....