<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler announces in-car 3G/WiFi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cellphonesignal.com/chrysler-announces-in-car-3gwifi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cellphonesignal.com/chrysler-announces-in-car-3gwifi/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:12:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zach Flauaus</title>
		<link>http://www.cellphonesignal.com/chrysler-announces-in-car-3gwifi/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Flauaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cellphonesignal.com/blog/?p=44#comment-30</guid>
		<description>@uconnectweb It&#039;s a monkey-see, monkey-do thing in the auto market anymore. Which isn&#039;t necessarily a bad thing. Like I said, this technology has been around for a year now, but it&#039;s now just being integrated into consumer cars.

@Janice I think I&#039;d actually prefer using the alternative because then it would be truly be a hotspot on the go. Granted, you can probably get stronger signal with the car, but that&#039;s what internal repeaters are for. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@uconnectweb It&#8217;s a monkey-see, monkey-do thing in the auto market anymore. Which isn&#8217;t necessarily a bad thing. Like I said, this technology has been around for a year now, but it&#8217;s now just being integrated into consumer cars.</p>
<p>@Janice I think I&#8217;d actually prefer using the alternative because then it would be truly be a hotspot on the go. Granted, you can probably get stronger signal with the car, but that&#8217;s what internal repeaters are for. <img src='http://www.cellphonesignal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://www.cellphonesignal.com/chrysler-announces-in-car-3gwifi/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cellphonesignal.com/blog/?p=44#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Awesome, Thanks for the alternative tip! 3G built in WIFI is an interesting, but predictable, luxury to bring to the market..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, Thanks for the alternative tip! 3G built in WIFI is an interesting, but predictable, luxury to bring to the market..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uconnectweb</title>
		<link>http://www.cellphonesignal.com/chrysler-announces-in-car-3gwifi/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>uconnectweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cellphonesignal.com/blog/?p=44#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Awesome! I&#039;ve been keenly interested in this new emerging technology since I&#039;ve first watched it on foxnews channel. I&#039;m seeing a great potential for this technology which can probably drive Chrysler&#039;s sales for 2009. Also, I&#039;m predicting this will be the trend and most other car companies will follow suit and would not dare leave themselves behind on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! I&#8217;ve been keenly interested in this new emerging technology since I&#8217;ve first watched it on foxnews channel. I&#8217;m seeing a great potential for this technology which can probably drive Chrysler&#8217;s sales for 2009. Also, I&#8217;m predicting this will be the trend and most other car companies will follow suit and would not dare leave themselves behind on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
