<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackberry 8900 4.6.1.152 OS leaked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cellphonesignal.com/blackberry-8900-461152-os-leaked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cellphonesignal.com/blackberry-8900-461152-os-leaked/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tzsm98</title>
		<link>http://www.cellphonesignal.com/blackberry-8900-461152-os-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>Tzsm98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cellphonesignal.com/?p=1282#comment-3006</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see such a detailed change and issue list. All device vendors could learn from this sort of detailed accounting. I get the feeling some manufacturers would prefer their customers not know there are issues, fix only what they absolutely have to fix, hope no one notices the rest and hope they don&#039;t screw up too much more in the process.

I&#039;m giving some thought to getting the 8900. Knowing there is this attention to detail increases the chances I&#039;ll do it. All mobile devices of this complicated nature are going to have firmware issues. I would imagine it is better to have one where issues are acknowledged and addressed than one where they are denied and swept under the rug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see such a detailed change and issue list. All device vendors could learn from this sort of detailed accounting. I get the feeling some manufacturers would prefer their customers not know there are issues, fix only what they absolutely have to fix, hope no one notices the rest and hope they don&#8217;t screw up too much more in the process.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m giving some thought to getting the 8900. Knowing there is this attention to detail increases the chances I&#8217;ll do it. All mobile devices of this complicated nature are going to have firmware issues. I would imagine it is better to have one where issues are acknowledged and addressed than one where they are denied and swept under the rug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
